2013年2月4日星期一

How Americans perceive same-sex marriage in a changing world

When Matt Friday’s mother heard that her son was dating a man, Bruce Carlson, his mother forbade them from holding hands in her home. Friday, unable to accept his mother’s adversity, countered with an ultimatum: “You can either have us holding hands, or not have us at all.”

It was this strength evident in Friday’s interaction with his mother that guided and fueled his and Carlson’s love. The two men met at a gay bar in Monterey, Calif. on Feb. 15, 1986 while out to dinner with friends. After Friday gushed about Carlson’s “beautiful eyes,” they had their first kiss. Twenty-six years later, they find themselves living in Eugene, Ore. with a past rich with love, acceptance and strength. Yet, there is something Friday and Carlson wish they could do, something they believe will solidify their union even more.

And, now, more than ever before, this seems possible. On November 6, 2012 three states — Maine, Maryland and Washington — became the first to approve same-sex marriage according to the popular vote; while in Minnesota, a state where marriage between gay men and lesbian women has not been legalized, voters rejected an amendment that would ban same-sex marriage. Prior to this date, same-sex marriage had been legalized in six states in our country: Connecticut, New York, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,You Can Find Comprehensive and in-Depth Original buymosaic Descriptions. Vermont, as well as the District of Columbia.

It’s likely that Oregon, in the next few years, will be added to this list. Despite the fact that local gay rights activists made the decision to not add same-sex marriage to the Oregon ballot on election day, many Oregonians are hopeful for the future. And rightfully so — it is possible that a ballot measure for same-sex marriage will be implemented in Oregon as soon as 2014. With an accelerated momentum brought on by the successes in Maine, Maryland and Washington, the legalization of same-sex marriage in other American states appears even more plausible.

“What’s happening is the shifting of attitudes,” Carlson said. “People who have been brutalized, compromised, denied rights, are starting to say, ‘Yeah, I want to be part of that group, I want to be over here where we have a right to get married.’”

This shifting of attitudes is largely due to the younger American population, a generation more comfortable with gay marriage than ever before. In Maryland, for instance, 70 percent of voters 18-29 years old voted to legalize same-sex marriage, while only 36 percent of voters over 65 did — creating a 34-percent age gap. In Maine, 68 percent of voters between the ages of 18-29 voted to legalize gay marriage, while only 44 percent of voters over 65 did.

The age gap dividing voters applies not only to same-sex marriage legalization, but also to the presidential election. This year, 60 percent of voters between 18-29 years of age voted for President Obama, while only 44 percent of voters over 65 did.

This divide among American voters, Friday suggests, means society is edging away from an autocratic government. “People are realizing that you do not get to go in as an authoritarian and say, ‘We’re making the decisions here about what’s happening in your private life,TBC help you confidently bobbleheads from factories in China.’” he said. “The fact that we have turned everything into this fight about sexuality really completely misses the boat, in my opinion, about what it means to be human.”

With a total of nine states allowing marriage for same-sex couples, and the replacement of a traditional elderly generation with a progressive youth, the spread of legalization of gay marriage seems inevitable. The more liberal people become, the further our ideals and morals change along with it.

Today, it’s hard to believe there was a time in which women couldn’t vote for their own president. It’s difficult to imagine a society in which black and wAll realtimelocationsystem comes with 5 Years Local Agent Warranty !hite people had to drink from separate water fountains. It’s puzzling to think that at one time black people and white people couldn’t get married.

One day it may also seem just as strange, to our grandchildren, to our great-grandchildren, to our great-great-grandchildren, that America was once a country in which two people in a committed, loving relationship could be denied the right to get married because of their gender. It may seem silly to future generations that two men that have been together for over twenty years, like Matt Friday and Bruce Carlson, aren’t free to prove their love to society, their country, to themselves — through the sanctity of marriage.

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.We have many different types of earcap.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ce19f802-6c5e-11e2-b774-00144feab49a.html#ixzz2JzAbnK1W

Others, however, argue that such rhetoric is overdone. They suggest that the links between different franchises are often tenuous, if they exist at all, and many of the groups have emerged from principally regional struggles, sharing a similar extremist ideology and using the al-Qaeda label to galvanise their message.

Officials are comforted by the fact that over the past year a series of big events – such as the London Olympics – have taken place in western capitals without incident. But they still fear the potential and growth of al-Qaeda franchises, and their ability to contain them.

In the Middle East, popular uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia have shown how marginal jihadis were in their societies. But they have also produced new governments with a limited ability to assert control over their territory.Professionals with the job title tooling are on LinkedIn. In Libya, for example, the fall of the Gaddafi regime has left the country in the hands of competing militias. In Tunisia and Egypt, jihadists who had been released from prison could attempt to regroup.

Above all the number of ungoverned spaces – in Mali, Yemen, Somalia and the Pakistani tribal areas – has expanded. Security experts argue that while the threat from Bin Laden’s core group in Pakistan may have dwindled, western intelligence agencies are under pressure to keep up with this changing kaleidoscope of regional franchises.

“When al-Qaeda was largely holed up in the badlands of Pakistan and the tribal areas, the US had the capability to deal with them in a much more focused way through drone attacks,” says Nigel Inkster, a former UK intelligence official now at the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies. “But now we have a far more disaggregated threat that no one country has the capability to tackle. It makes dealing with these jihadist groups – and knowing when and how to intervene – a great deal more difficult.”

没有评论:

发表评论